Article in Preparation
This article will consolidate the insights from MiCAR, the US initiatives, China/e‑CNY and the key markets into a unified comparison logic. Rather than viewing each country in isolation, the key parameters are placed side by side – from regulatory clarity and stablecoin/CBDC maturity to accounting treatment and industry fit.
Planned Contents
- Comparison columns for the EU, US, China and selected key markets: regulatory clarity, stablecoin regime, CBDC maturity, tokenisation (securities/deposits).
- Assessment of passporting/extraterritoriality, accounting questions and supervisory expectations.
- Industry fit: suitability for B2B use cases, programmable payments and intercompany scenarios.
- “Time to go‑live” indicator: maturity of market, infrastructure and regulation from a corporate perspective.
Planned Outputs
- Scoring table with traffic‑light logic (“ready”, “pilot”, “immature”) per market and use‑case category.
- Downloadable CSV sheet for internal maintenance (e.g. adding internal criteria and scores).
- Guidance on how to embed the scoring in decision papers, risk assessments and roadmaps.
Note
This content does not constitute legal or tax advice. It is designed to give management, finance, compliance and IT a shared, structured view of the relevant markets – as a decision bridge towards deeper analysis and tailored advice.